Tinubu May Lose Control Of APC In New Leadership Struggle .

 The National Executive Committee (NEC) of the APC had on June 25, 2020, dissolved its National Working Committee (NWC) where Tinubu and his associ­ates had a clear majority.

They lost the battle as the management of the party structure is now in the hands of a caretaker committee and state governors who are bat­tling to reassert their control over the party’s machinery.

Although the general view is that Tinubu will run for the presidency in 2023, but he has not announced any such inten­tions.

Sources said the former Lagos State governor now ex­periences serious rivals in the party.

The divisions in the party are said to be led by the camps of Nasir el Rufai, governor of Kaduna State and Rotimi Amaechi, Minister of Trans­port on one side; and deposed chairman of the APC, Adams Oshiomhole, on the other.

Other factions within the party include Kebbi State governor, Atiku Bagudu; Ekiti State governor, Kayode Fayemi and Works Minister, Babatunde Fashola.

All the warriors are said to be modest about their am­bitions, but many have their eyes on the 2023 general polls.

“Don’t forget that an Abuja High Court ruling on March 5, 2020, which ordered Oshiom­hole to obey his suspension by his ward in Edo State, opened the fault lines of the APC pitching its governors against Tinubu.

“Tinubu is known to have installed Oshiomhole and has being his back bone, shielding him from the party’s ambitious state chief executives who see the national chairman as a stumbling block to their 2023 presidential aspirations.

“With the court ruling, be­lieved to have been procured by proxy by the governors, the stage was set for an epic battle with the national leader,” said a party chieftain who does not want his name published.

He added that the party “quickly moved to avert a power vacuum that the court ruling would have created, an­nouncing the approval of nom­inations into vacant positions in the NWC.”

The Caretaker/Extraor­dinary Convention Planning Committee of the APC warned last week that the main aim of dissolving the immediate-past NWC of the party will be de­feated if the party goes into a national convention in a crisis.

The Deputy National Pub­licity Secretary, Yekini Nabena, in a statement, said the focus of the committee is on achieving and sustaining lasting unity, peace and reconciliation in the party ahead of the planned na­tional convention of the party.

He spoke against the back­drop of a groundswell of opposition by APC members against an alleged plot to ex­tend the tenure of the commit­tee beyond December.

Also, the Director General of the Progressives Governors Forum, Dr. Salihu Lukman, on Thursday, described those op­posed to the planned member­ship registration/revalidation exercise, as political bandits who were desperate to install surrogate leaders.

In a statement titled, “Cam­paign against Membership Registration in APC: A Smoke­screen for Surrogate Leader­ship,” in Abuja, Lukman, noted that claims by some party lead­ers that the mandate given to the caretaker committee didn’t include membership registra­tion, were being dishonest.

He said, “In this age of banditry, it will appear that some of our so-called leaders are as skillful in politics as the criminal bandits ravaging our communities – towns and vil­lages. We must appeal to these so-called leaders to come back to their senses. For anybody to claim our party’s membership, not even emerge as a leader, the legal standing of such a person must be beyond suspect.

“One will expect any leader of the party with any claim of being a progressive or even democratic politician to wel­come the need to have member­ship registration/verification ahead of the APC National Convention.

“In fact, even after member­ship registration/verification, before we can satisfy that there are legal delegates for any Na­tional Convention, APC would require Ward, Local Govern­ment, and State Congresses.

“These congresses need to hold ahead of the National Convention to affirm that the delegates to attend the National Convention have the authority of party members.”

The PGF DG further ex­plained that the debate ought to be about how to conduct both the membership registration and congresses in ways that would assist in resolving the lingering leadership crisis in the party.

He, however, said, “Sadly, it would appear that it is the old challenge of ensuring that the party remained with cri­sis-prone approaches based on some tight-fisted control of par­ty structures by some leaders.

“This means, the design is not about laying a strong foun­dation for the party based on which the rules of the party are the reference point but in­stead ensuring t